Patients and methods

This was a prospective consecutive study of the efficacy of FCT on horizontal dynamic forehead wrinkles performed by a single physician. Informed consent was obtained from each patient before all procedures.

Subjects

Eligible subjects were men and women aged 20–65 years with flat or concave temples and moderate-to-severe dynamic wrinkles in the forehead (at maximum raise of eyebrows), as assessed using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) (Table 1). Exclusion criteria included any medical conditions that might have put the patient at risk with exposure to cold (e.g. cryoglobulinaemia, paroxysmal cold haemoglobinuria, cold urticaria, and Raynaud’s disease). Patients with open or infected wounds and existing neuromuscular disease were also excluded.

Treatment

The iovera device was used to apply FCT to the temporal branches of the facial nerve. This handheld device delivers compressed liquid nitrous oxide to a close-ended 27 gauge, 6.9 mm long three-needle probe.

After marking and anaesthetising the area with subcutaneous injections of 2% lidocaine (without adrenaline), eligible patients were placed in a supine position for treatment. The aforementioned probe, connected to the iovera device, was inserted into the temple region where FCT was delivered and a cold zone was formed around the temporal branches of the facial nerve. Each treatment consisted of four to six FCT cycles (one cycle per probe insertion) in each temple.

Table 1

Efficacy measures

Severity of dynamic wrinkles was assessed using the FWS, before and after the treatment, by the physician. Subjects assessed the change in dynamic wrinkle severity on a 9-point scale and rated their degree of satisfaction with the treatment on a 7-point scale (Table 1). Scores of more than +2 points on the improvement scale were considered to be an improvement and scores of 6 and above on the satisfaction scale were considered to be complete satisfaction.

Safety measures

Adverse events (AEs) were documented based on subject-reported signs and symptoms, and physical examination performed by the investigator.

Statistical analysis

Wrinkle severity scores before and after the procedure were analysed for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Ranks Test.

Table 2

Results

Twenty-five subjects (22 women, 3 men) aged 23–52 years (mean age 35.6 ± 7.7 years) participated in this study. All patients had moderate to severe dynamic forehead wrinkles at maximum raise of eyebrows before the procedure. As seen in Table 2, the wrinkle score at maximum raise of eyebrows reduced immediately following FCT. Improvement on horizontal forehead dynamic wrinkle severity was observed on every subject. The mean wrinkle score at maximum raise of eyebrows reduced significantly by 2.24 after FCT (0.44 ± 0.6) when compared with before the treatment (2.68 ± 0.5) (P<0.0001). Twenty-four patients (96%) reported a significant improvement in horizontal dynamic forehead wrinkle severity immediately after the procedure; one patient (4%) reported slight improvement (considered insignificant), one patient (4%) reported moderate improvement, seven patients (28%) reported marked improvement, and  16 patients (64%) reported complete improvement (Figure 1). All patients were satisfied with the treatment; six patients (24%) were satisfied and 19 patients (76%) were very satisfied with FCT (Figure 2).

Figure 1 Improvement in forehead dynamic wrinkle severity (at maximum raise of eyebrows), as perceived by subjects. Twenty-four patients (96%) reported a significant improvement; one patient (4%) reported slight improvement (considered insignificant), one patient (4%) reported moderate improvement, seven patients (28%) reported marked improvement, and 16 patients (64%) reported complete improvement

Figure 1 Improvement in forehead dynamic wrinkle severity (at maximum raise of eyebrows), as perceived by subjects. Twenty-four patients (96%) reported a significant improvement; one patient (4%) reported slight improvement (considered insignificant), one patient (4%) reported moderate improvement, seven patients (28%) reported marked improvement, and 16 patients (64%) reported complete improvement